An article in Bloombergbusinessweek (February 4, 2013) describes the tunnels (now numbering 500 but up to 1000 at one time) between the Gaza strip and Egypt. Transporting motorcycles, cars, contraband between the two sides enabled owners of these tunnels to charge a premium of $1000 to transport a bike from Egypt. The cost to build a tunnel, estimated at up to $ 250,000, is financed with an upfront payment and a share of the profits associated with goods transported – a revenue sharing contract. But more recent moves by Israel to open the borders has eased the availability of goods, thus lowering the incentive for tunnel trade. What does the efficiency of pricing of tunnel trade say about the predictability of embargoes as a political strategy ? The more recent moves to tax tunnel flows to fund the government in Gaza is claimed to have incented the creation of longer more complex tunnels – capital investments whose payoff is in the illegal movement and thus avoidance of taxes – what does this say about the magnitude of the taxes and projected revenues ?
Tags
automobiles Capability Capacity China Collaboration competition Consumers Coordination Cost Costs Demand Surge Design disruption Dual Sourcing Ecommerce Efficiency Environment exports Global Growth Imports India Infrastructure Inventory Legal Low Margins Loyal Customers manufacturing Margins Outsourcing Quality Rare Earths regulation Retail Risk river transport Service software Suppliers Supply Chain Survival Sustainable transport Trends Water-
Recent Posts
- The economics of the $6.75 shirt in Bangladesh
- Software to track detailed flows from prescriptions to drug usage at the patient level
- Cambodia’s shoe factory collapse, with Japanese owners, shipping to Asian markets
- Sharing costs for inspection and dispute resolution in Bangladesh
- Ecommerce in Nigeria – motorcycles, tuk tuks and vans to deliver goods and collect funds
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- October 2010
Categories
Meta
As with anything, if there is a market for something people will find a way. Why make a popular trade illegal with an embargo? You lose the ability to tax and monitor what actually comes across. How about protection for those involved? When violence and thievery happens in an illegal operation, who do you go to for protection? Legalize and tax. *Stepping off libertarian soap box*